Thread: Is the Big Bang Theory correct?

It seems rather clear to me, and possibly to others as well, although I have no proof and no training in Astrophysics, that what we perceive as "The Universe" is but an infinitely small part of a much larger "everything", some might call this the "Omniverse".

I believe that the Big Bang theory is essentially correct in that it explains the beginnings of "our universe", and will likely explain the end of the our universe as we know it. But our universe is neither the beginning nor the end of everything. As one of the previous posters had commented, there seems to be something beyond the universe drawing parts of our universe towards it. Almost certainly, if we had telescopes powerful enough, we would see that what is drawing the galaxies towards this "gravity well" is another universe's gravitational pull, we just do not currently have the technology to see it.

According to String Theory, there are 11 dimensions, and it is the occasional interaction between these dimensional planes that "create" new universes, much like two pieces of metal striking each other and creating a spark. If the Omniverse is infinitely older than our wildest imagination, and over this virtually infinite period of time there have been countless universes which have come in and out of existence, then it is likely that what will happen to us has happened countless times before. In fact, in an infinite amount of time, every possible outcome of every atom or string or what have you, would have undergone every possible permutation and combination, so perhaps what is happening to us has already happened countless times throughout the virtually infinite lifespan of the Omniverse.

Originally Posted by Satviewer2000

I believe that the Big Bang theory is essentially correct in that it explains the beginnings of "our universe", and will likely explain the end of the our universe as we know it. But our universe is neither the beginning nor the end of everything. As one of the previous posters had commented, there seems to be something beyond the universe drawing parts of our universe towards it. Almost certainly, if we had telescopes powerful enough, we would see that what is drawing the galaxies towards this "gravity well" is another universe's gravitational pull, we just do not currently have the technology to see it.

hi satviewer2000

welcome to the forums hope you enjoy

i thought they did have techknowledgy to see this it due the black hole at the centre of a galaxy that draws one galaxy into another there is a theroy that our own solar system was part of smaller galaxy that has been drawn in to this one due to the gravitaional pull of the black hole, the galaxy we

but since i already posted about it i will just send you link
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=168

Hello Friends.
This is a very interesting topic to discuss and read views of others. I don't know anything about big bang theory accept that some big unions like CERN are trying to find its theories.Here, in this topic I got some interesting views that focus on big bang theory. Nice topic to discuss guys.

I think its naieve to think , that there was nothing there before the big bang . I also believe we are a long way off from ever knowing the the full picture . :o

Given the way how Science operates, there is no such thing as "correct" in it, as the validity of any theory or law can be determined only in a certain reference frame of applicability. Big Bang is related to Cosmogony, which is not a branch of Science anyhow, but rather a way how we perceive and explain the Universe and its history. In this sense Big Bang is "correct" for our present level of understanding, despite even on this current level this theory fails to answer all possible related questions - so one can say it is correct in the same sense as the Flat Earth theory was correct in its time.

Theories as such hardly can be "correct" at all, as any theory proved correct immediately becomes a Law of Nature. The difference here is that the Theories target to provide description and explanations of the events and known facts, while the Laws are used to predict the events with 100% precision. Big Bang is an explanation, a possible model, neither it can be [to date] tested experimentally nor it explains the origins and nature of the Bang itself. For Science it only sets up a possible direction of further research on the issue.

I like that ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ explanation up there ^^^^^^^^^ .. very nicely put